Legal Simulation Screen

The AI Plays
Opposing Counsel

Upload the relevant legal documents — a contract, a case brief, a sworn statement, a deposition transcript. The AI absorbs every word and then questions you as opposing counsel would, drawing exclusively from the document you provided.

  • AI introduces itself as opposing counsel and places you on record
  • Questions are structured, adversarial, and legally grounded
  • Challenges inconsistencies and probes for ambiguity
  • Does not break character throughout the session
  • Fully voice-driven — you answer out loud, as in a real deposition
Upgrade to Pro →

Deception Analysis

Your Words Are
Being Analyzed

Every response you give is scored in real time across five verbal deception indicators — the same markers that interrogation professionals, attorneys, and forensic linguists use to evaluate witness testimony.

Timing Anomalies
Low
Filler Words
Mid
Distancing Language
Low
Non-Contractions
High
Protest Language
Low

⚠️ Disclaimer

Deception analysis is a behavioral indicator tool, not a lie detector. No universal sign of deception exists — context, anxiety, stress, and individual baseline all matter. Results are for preparation training only and should not be used as evidence of dishonesty.


The Five Deception Dimensions

What the AI Is
Listening For

Each dimension is scored independently. The composite score gives you an overall deception risk indicator for that response.

⏱️

Timing Anomalies

Unusually long pauses before answering, or rushed responses that skip over details. Timing irregularities relative to question complexity are flagged.

🗣️

Filler Word Density

Excessive use of "um," "uh," "you know," and "like" can indicate cognitive load from managing a deceptive narrative. High density above baseline is flagged.

↔️

Distancing Language

Passive voice and third-person constructions ("the decision was made") used to distance the speaker from their own actions — a well-documented deception pattern.

📝

Non-Contractions

Over-formal precision that avoids contractions ("I did not" vs. "I didn't") is associated with rehearsed, careful testimony. Research by Vrij & others links this to deception attempts.

🚩

Protest Language

Unsolicited emphasis on honesty — "I swear," "I promise," "To be completely honest" — correlates with deceptive intent in forensic linguistics research.


Who It's For

Legal Professionals
Who Prepare Seriously

⚖️

Attorneys

Prepare your witnesses before deposition. Run them through a simulated cross-examination to find weak spots in their testimony before opposing counsel does.

👔

Defendants & Witnesses

Practice answering hard questions under pressure in a safe environment. Reduce anxiety, build consistency, and identify verbal patterns that may work against you.

📚

Law Students

Deposition practice, moot court preparation, bar exam simulation. The AI generates legally-structured questions from any case document you provide.

🏢

Corporate Professionals

Regulatory hearings, HR investigations, congressional testimony preparation. Practice giving clean, consistent answers to adversarial questioning.


Pro Feature

The Witness Stand
Is No Place to Improvise

Legal Mode is available exclusively with Hot Seat Pro. Upgrade today and run your first deposition simulation tonight.

View Pro Plans →